Search for: "State v. Garcia"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2014, 12:21 pm
A stark contrast to the fairly brief period of probation you're likely to receive in state court if you slash its tires or (maybe) even if you steal it and drive it into a lake.And your conviction and sentence will be affirmed by the Ninth Circuit.Briefly put, there's pretty much no possible way to fill in the blank in the following sentence with something that makes sense: "It's a nice day today. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Some applications have been pending for two years, according to the suit.This has prevented Garcia from traveling to religious meetings outside the United States, infringing on his religious freedom, the lawsuit said.In O Centro Espirita Beneficente União do Vegetal in the U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 8:37 am
From the Supreme Court's statement in Noem v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Garcia-Salas, No. 07-2126 (10th Cir. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
See Garcia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 10:17 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:06 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 3:23 am
Garcia v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 4:19 pm
State, stating “[a]lthough such a defendant cannot advance a due diligence defense, he has the statutory twenty-day remedy, and in appropriate circumstances, may have a Constitutional speedy hearing claim under Barker v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 6:02 am
Garcia v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
As an example, a recent district court case, Robert Garcia v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
Via John Wesley Hall at the Fourth Amendment Blog, courtesy of Liberty and Justice For Y'all, the 5th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:06 pm
Garcia (Tribal Officials, Sovereign Immunity) Pueblo of Jemez v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 12:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 10:56 am
End of story.The California Court of Appeal, in an unpublished opinion by Justice King in 2011, held otherwise, stating that the "No" was really ambiguous, and hence the suspect's subsequent confession during the questioning was properly admitted at trial.That's wrong, the Ninth Circuit says. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:54 pm
Despite my general approval of certifying state law questions, as I said a while back, I'd have elected to decline to answer this question certified by the Ninth Circuit.But one needs no reminder to recall that my vote counts for absolutely nothing. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 8:54 am
Garcia Tatupu v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:47 pm
The Per Curiam Opinion (from the Chief, and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, obviously) in Leal Garcia v. [read post]
