Search for: "State v. J. D. B." Results 181 - 200 of 3,331
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Kenan Farrell
Court Case Number: 1:23-cv-01058-MPB-KMBFile Date: June 19, 2023Plaintiff: DGC Indiana, Inc. d/b/a Dillon Construction Group a/k/a/ Dillon Construction a/k/a DCG ConstructionPlaintiff Counsel: J. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am by Bill Marler
State laboratories can send STEC cultures to the CDC to determine the serotype. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that  “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am by Frank Cranmer
Constable J rejected the argument that Groups A  and B (representing the Church of England) were designed to represent faith groups while Groups C (representing teachers) and D (representing the local authority) were designed to be secular [65]. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:59 am by Caroline Schmitz
But, nonetheless, on May 3, 2023, a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in Traffic Jam Events LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:41 pm by Michael Lowe
The term “controlled substance” means “a drug or other substance, or immediate precursor, included in schedule I, II, III, IV, or V of part B of this subchapter. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am by Patricia Hughes
Ontario (“Working Families II”), both decisions of Morgan J. in the Superior Court, and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:53 am by David Post
"  Here's the lineup: GORSUCH, J., announced the judgment of the Court, and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, III, IV–A, and V, in which THOMAS, SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, and BARRETT, JJ., joined, an opinion with respect to Parts IV–B and IV–D, in which THOMAS and BARRETT, JJ., joined, and an opinion with respect to Part IV–C, in which THOMAS, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., joined. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]