Search for: "State v. J. M. E." Results 181 - 200 of 2,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
 This point could be inferred from the reasoning of the Advocate General and the CJEU in Case C-205/13 Hauck GmbH & Co KG v Stokke A/S, which indicated that an important purpose of Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of the Trade Marks Directive was to prevent the use of indefinite trade marks protection to extend the time-limited protection of other intellectual property rights. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:31 am by Nancy B.
  Assuming some of the damage occurred during the course of MV Homes’ work, Judge Jackson found that exclusion j(5) did not bar a coverage claim.Exclusion j(6), states Judge Jackson, quoting, Advantage Homebuilding, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:18 am by Orin Kerr
First, the Eighth Circuit has expressly approved of the constitutionality of an out-of-state e-mail warrant in one case, United States v. [read post]