Search for: "State v. Jacks" Results 181 - 200 of 2,955
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Dennis Aftergut
In contrast to Smith’s approach, judge-shopping from the start in Missouri v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:29 pm by Josh Blackman
Would Jack Phillips have lost on free speech grounds? [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 9:15 am by Beatriz Beserra
On June 8, the United States Supreme Court handed down a surprisingly decisive ruling on trademark law and its relationship with First Amendment rights. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 9:15 am by Beatriz Beserra
On June 8, the United States Supreme Court handed down a surprisingly decisive ruling on trademark law and its relationship with First Amendment rights. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 12:48 am by Joseph Fishkin
Yesterday’s blockbuster student loan decision in Biden v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am by CMS
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax Disputes & Investigations team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in HMRC v SSE Generation Ltd [2023] UKSC 17, which was handed down on 17 May 2023. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm by Aaron Moss
The Transfers In the parties’ agreement (read here), Gallo and Sweet Revenge expressly represented and warranted that Gallo “created and/or wrote the Story as an employee-for-hire” of Sweet Revenge, and that the story “constitutes a work-made-for-hire pursuant to the United States Copyright Laws. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
Whether you operate a large e-commerce company on Amazon, a specialized artisan store on Shopify or Etsy, or a local t-shirt company, all brands producing products resembling famous marks should consider the implications of the seminal Supreme Court ruling in Jack Daniels v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Many trademark attorneys and professors hoped the Supreme Court would provide more guidance on how to resolve conflicts between trademark and free speech rights in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:11 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Anna Bower (June 14, 2023) A Primer on the Silent Witness Rule and United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:44 pm by Tyler McBrien
On June 16, Special Counsel Jack Smith submitted a motion for a protective order limiting disclosure of discovery information, as well as the proposed protective order, in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
Grimaldi test was too permissive of “expressive works” that cause confusion.[8] Counsel for Jack Daniels advocated elimination of the Rogers v. [read post]