Search for: "State v. James E." Results 181 - 200 of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2014, 7:56 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Jerold Dunn, No. 106,586 (Labette)Direct appeal (petition for review); Forgery/stalkingRick KittelDefective complaint (forgery)Insufficient evidence (stalking)State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:24 am
Case CommentsTai-Heng Cheng & Robert Trisotto, Urbaser SA and others v Argentine Republic and Teinver SA and others v Argentine Republic: A Workaround to the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause DisputeKarel Daele, Saint Gobain v Venezuela and Blue Bank v Venezuela: The Standard for Disqualifying Arbitrators Finally Settled and LoweredAlexandre Genest, Mobil Investments v Canada: A Blow to Policy Space and Predictability for Measures Subject to… [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Haupt, Professional Speech (October 13, 2014).Georgina Yeomans, The Constitutionality of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 in Light of Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:09 am by Wells Bennett
Fresh from the Guantanamo security scrub: an amended docketing order for the upcoming hearing, late this month, in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Bill Marler
  For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19]  Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations… [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm by DMLP Staff
Bullock; Dara Lindenbaum; Joseph E Sandler; Lesli D. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:21 pm by DMLP Staff
Bullock; Dara Lindenbaum; Joseph E Sandler; Lesli D. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]