Search for: "State v. Leathers"
Results 181 - 200
of 329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
Reversed.In State of Indiana v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:20 am
Colorado is a death penalty state. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
BackgroundIn 2008, Yannick Noah, a French former tennis player, registered the following figurative sign (the Mark) as a European Union trade mark (EUTM), in respect of a number of categories of goods, including leather goods, clothing, games and playthings (the Registration): In 2019, Noah Clothing LLC, a clothing company based in the United States, filed an application with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) seeking revocation of the Registration,… [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:36 am
Leegin - The Supreme Court's recent decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
This said, a collection of multiple NFTs is actually a collection of multiple, non-fungible, products similar in kind to a physical product produced and sold in a series although within a limited edition.As a sidenote, it is also worth noting that the forthcoming EU Market in Crypto Assets Regulation (MICA) states that “the issuance of crypto-assets as non-fungible tokens in a large series or collection should be considered as an indicator of their fungibility” (Recital 6c, last… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
The story behind the ruling runs like this: In January 2011, the Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd ('RCB') applied to register as a CTM the figurative sign reproduced, above right, for inter alia, ‘spectacles, spectacle cases, spectacle frames, spectacle glasses, sun glasses; and accessories therefor’ (Class 9); ‘watches, jewellery, precious stones, precious metals, goods coated in precious metals’ (Class 14); ‘leather goods;… [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:16 am
Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:42 pm
The oral argument (transcript here) in the case of Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:00 pm
Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc., 171 Fed. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:52 am
In a unanimous decision the US Supreme Court held in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:52 am
In a unanimous decision the US Supreme Court held in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:11 pm
General Electric Co., 272 U.S. 476 (1926) was implicitly overruled by the Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:28 am
” Gimpel v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 7:51 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 4:04 am
Danier Leather Inc., 2007 SCC 44. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
The case is O’Sullivan Films v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
The case is O’Sullivan Films v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 7:30 pm
In 1997, in State Oil v. [read post]
