Search for: "State v. M. Long"
Results 181 - 200
of 9,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2008, 4:50 pm
I'm still on the road, but have long enough on-line to note this post at The BLT about today's two SCOTUS sentencing cases argued today and also to provide links to the transcripts thanks to SCOTUSblog:The transcript of today's argument in in Greenlaw v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 7:25 am
Transocean Offshore USA, Inc., et al., No. 05-300963, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed its long standing decision that a watercraft under construction is not a “vessel in navigation” for purposes of the Jones Act. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:14 pm
By Lisa M. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 4:47 pm
v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am
For many years I used to state in my author's profile (the one in the right column) that, in order to avoid conflicts of interest, I didn't hold or initiate transactions involving technology stocks. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In last week’s judgment in the case of Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromedia CMR Inc (2011 SCC 9) the Supreme Court of Canada refused to permit a “class action” for libel by Arabic and Creole speaking Montreal taxi drivers who had been subjected to racist and abusive coments by Andre Arthur, a “shock jock” (turned MP)(pictured right) in the course of a radio broadcast. [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Byrd v. United States: The Supreme Court Takes a Broad View of Fourth Amendment Standing
15 May 2018, 4:12 am
Although I confess I'm not exactly sure how. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
The court begins the opinion by explaining thatVickie M. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:28 am
Megan M. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:47 am
Catherine M. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
M/V Delta Mariner. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:36 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 9:21 am
(I’m not exactly sure what the court is saying here. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 11:13 am
The brief from We All Help Patients (Jarod M. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
Hannah Lauck of the Eastern District of Virginia recently handed down the long-awaited opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 1:24 pm
But there's a little known codicil of Title 31 that allows the United States to open up virtually anything, without any reason -- and certainly FedEx packages -- as long as they're ostensibly looking for currency violations. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
And, after a really long break, we're back. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:11 pm
Stephen M. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
The AUSAs are so much better funded, the prosecutors are so vigorous, the sentences are so long, and (critically) in federal court you've got to actually serve at least 85% of your sentence whereas in state court you generally only serve half (with good behavior).It almost seems like piling on; just adding to the indignities and practical harms that arise from relegating Native Americans to isolated reservations.Now, again, in these particular cases, I get it, it's hard… [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
