Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 181 - 200
of 11,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2011, 3:28 am
Maine 2010) [Cyprus] [Federal and State Judicial Remedies] [Stay] Charalambous v Charalambous, 744 F.Supp.2d 379 (D. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
United States and McDonnell v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 10:52 am
Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, and Alito dissented (Does 1-3 v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 9:31 am
In Oliver v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:13 pm
On December 13, 2017, the European Commission filed an amicus brief in the United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 12:13 pm
On December 13, 2017, the European Commission filed an amicus brief in the United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 10:43 am
Fortin v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 9:53 am
AT&T v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:31 am
A trial court rejected these claims and dismissed the lawsuit – Hill-Spotswood v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:03 am
Breyer wrote the main opinion. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:15 pm
State of Maine challenges the fundamental structure of Maine's drug court system. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
The statute, after all, implemented the CWC, and the main point of Holland has been that federalism does not constrain implementing legislation. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am
We recently discussed a troubling decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Porter v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:26 am
Thus, a decision of the federal district court in Portland, Maine, was affirmed (Plixer International, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
On Tuesday, January 17, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Davis Main Brief 2. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 7:30 am
27 June 2007 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Court decided on The Saunders Group, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 11:05 am
United States McKinney v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In Jane Does 1-6 v. [read post]
