Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 181 - 200
of 10,281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2007, 9:53 am
AT&T v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:03 am
Breyer wrote the main opinion. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am
We recently discussed a troubling decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Porter v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
The statute, after all, implemented the CWC, and the main point of Holland has been that federalism does not constrain implementing legislation. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:15 pm
State of Maine challenges the fundamental structure of Maine's drug court system. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 7:30 am
27 June 2007 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Court decided on The Saunders Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Davis Main Brief 2. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 4:00 am
While that litigation was pending, the Maine legislature amended state law to provide that schools receiving state funds cannot discriminate on the basis of religion, sexual orientation or gender identity. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 11:05 am
United States McKinney v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 am
In Hutchinson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:50 pm
The Evans v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:50 pm
The Evans v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In Jane Does 1-6 v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 4:38 am
Here is the complaint in Penobscot Nation v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:54 am
Like its federal counterpart, Maine Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's... [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:51 am
In 1987, Federal judge Christine Cook Nettesheim accurately characterized the initial 1973 asbestos case, Borel v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
Such a joinder would have unduly burdened the proceedings, and the medical center had been given an adequate alternative method to participate in the enforcement action—the submission of oral and written comments to the trial court overseeing the action.The case, State of Maine v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:38 am
Ethical considerations in the wake of Hunter v. [read post]
