Search for: "State v. Manufactured Home Communities, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 4:54 am by Sean Wajert
The few states that recognize medical monitoring as a remedy recognize it as a cause of action, like Pennsylvania, Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:35 am by Roy Ginsburg
  This is an especially attractive option for principals based outside of Minnesota, who might prefer to have all their contracts with sales representatives governed by their home state’s law. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:14 am
Rum production occurs throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, but it has been Cuban rum that has been the subject of decades'-long dispute, and two weeks ago, the subject a Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decision in Pernod Ricard USA LLC v Bacardi USA, Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14]   In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am by A.J.B.
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14]   In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
Husqvarna, Inc., 390 N.W.2d 363, 366 (Minn. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm by Bexis
Generic Manufacturers Win Preemption In MensingThe Court decided 5-4 in favor of generic preemption today in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:31 pm by My name
”[2] This was the first time since the Supreme Court ruled in MGM Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Sometimes the plaintiffs are really serious about pharmacy warning claims, but more often pharmacies are sued on failure to warn theories for tactical reasons – such as adding a non-diverse (that’s a resident of the plaintiff’s home state, for you non-lawyers) defendant to prevent the case from being removed from state to federal court.In either case, representing manufacturer defendants, we’d usually not have a pharmacist around… [read post]