Search for: "State v. Master"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2012, 6:35 pm
Under state law, "an employee acts within the scope where the action at issue: 1) is the kind he is employed to perform; 2) occurs substantially within the time and space limits of the employment; and 3) was activated at least in part by a purpose to serve the master," the Court explained. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 3:10 am
Arbitrator’s award must be confirmed if not completely irrationalMatter of Rochester City School Dist. v Rochester Teachers Assn., 38 AD3d 1152Supreme Court, Monroe County, Judge William P. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:02 pm
In Parks v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:09 am
Test Masters Educational Services, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:11 am
Prigg v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 11:17 am
Georgia and Texas v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm
Environmental Council of Sacramento v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 7:25 am
Nijensohn v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 6:14 am
In Texas v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in making sure state courts rightly interpret state constitutions (just pause for a minute to think about how weird from a federalism standpoint that very concept sounds) is not just “made up” and thus anti-originalist, it also flouts more than a century of clear teachings by the Court that state courts are the master interpreters of state law (Green v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
… Tenny v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court, in Zehl v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:30 am
In Paslay v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 1:30 am
The injured worker will have no recourse against the employer in respondeat superiorand the rule provides that "where a servant is injured through the negligence or fault of a fellow servant, engaged in a common business and employment ... if the master is himself free from fault, the master is not responsible for the injury. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:19 am
The United States has filed its appellate brief in the case of Al-Janko v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 6:44 pm
Justice Hinds cited Master Horn in Lee v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:58 pm
However, unmentioned and undiscussed is the line of authority stemming from United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Sproat in Covelli v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:15 am
During IPWatchdog’s Standards, Patents & Competition Masters 2022 program last week, one panel examined the standard essential patent (SEP) landscape in Europe, which has become decidedly more patent owner friendly than that of the United States in recent years. [read post]
