Search for: "State v. Oxford" Results 181 - 200 of 1,722
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
Ofcom states that if competition concerns are identified, it could lead to further action. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
But it would be a risky mistake to dismiss or ignore this latest gambit.Even so, we should not miss the elements of a head-spinning flip-flop that have accompanied this move.In May, following the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health opinion, Graham praised its embrace of states’ rights.As he put it at the time, “If the Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Have our views of the goal or purpose of a free state changed over time? [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:36 am by Cristina Mariottini
Mariottini, Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law: Henry Deeb GABRIEL, Contracts for the Sale of Goods – A Comparison of U.S. and International Law, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2022, pp. v-401. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm by John Armour
A version of this post appeared on the Oxford Business Law Blog here. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
FEC, Disclosure, Political spending, State law, Taxation SEC Bulletin on Conflicts of Interest for Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Posted by W. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
This contrasts with Re St Ebbe with Holy Trinity and St Peter Le Bailey [2011] Oxford Const. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
The amicus brief of the Organization of American Historians in Brackeen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Becerra (2018) (dealing with compelled speech regarding abortion), and Janus v. [read post]