Search for: "State v. Payne" Results 181 - 200 of 443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
” One farmer told Amnesty researchers that Kurdish forces threatened to tell the United States that his family was Islamic State if he did not leave his home. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:22 pm
 Although stare decisis is not an "inexorable command" it is nevertheless the desirable course as it promotes the predictable and consistent development of law (Payne v Tennessee) and avoids the expensive reopening of litigation. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:37 am by Native American Rights Fund
Wilkinson (Fiduciary duty - Oil and Gas Leases) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlIn re Payne/Pumphrey/Fortson, Minors (Indian Child Welfare Act - Termination of Parental Rights) In re K.J.B. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 5 May 2015 HHJ Moloney QC heard an application for an injunction in the case of Bell v Payne. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Michael Payne
In a recent decision issued by the United States Court of Federal Claims, Anthem Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
The court relied on the leading statement about the availability of Rule 39.03 examinations in the context of judicial review applications in the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Payne v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 9132 (MD TN, Jan. 27, 2015), a Tennessee federal district court permitted an inmate to move ahead with his complaint that authorities refused to provide a room for Hanafi Muslims to meet twice a week for study and prayer.In Payne v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:10 am
”Christopher Rootham, a partner at Nelligan O’Brien Payne LLP in Ottawa, who represented the RCMP officers in Meredith, says the ruling is significant in that it creates a perception that wage-restraint legislation is constitutionally permissible in certain circumstances. [read post]