Search for: "State v. Prophet" Results 181 - 200 of 255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clement of the Washington law firm of Bancroft PLLC, representing 26 states, followed by Michael D. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:44 am by Yvonne Daly
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 centred on the constitutionality of s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, as amended by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Fini Jeremy Griffith v ABC, possibly Australia’s longest running defamation action, stuttered to an end in the High Court, when the self-proclaimed prophet was refused special leave. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:53 am by The Book Review Editor
In explaining his choice of title for the book, he cites a hadith—an action or saying attributed to the Prophet Muhammad—describing an army carrying black banners coming from the region of Khurasan. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:21 am by Eugene Volokh
The judge ruled that Sabaditsch-Wolff committed a crime by stating in her seminars about Islam that the Islamic prophet Mohammed was a pedophile (Sabaditsch-Wolff’s actual words were “Mohammed had a thing for little girls. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
The problem is that the state of Texas also doesn't know.Well, yeah. [read blog]
6 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm by Jeff Gamso
The problem is that the state of Texas also doesn't know.Well, yeah. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Charlie Hebdo, a French satirical weekly publication, has once again produced a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed image in a special supplement distributed with the newspaper Liberation. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
They were: Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276 (set aside on appeal) and DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB) (granted for seven days for anti-tipping-off reasons). [read post]