Search for: "State v. Rand" Results 181 - 200 of 479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2016, 6:37 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Senators say fixes to disability insurance not enough, January 28, 2016, The Hill More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 8:06 am
(2) United State Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Bilski (business method) Patent Case (0) Transformers v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 12:52 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Less than a week after the Roberts Court issued its decision in National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius, Jeffrey Toobin, writing in The New Yorker, compared the first part of Chief Justice John Roberts's opinion, in which he found that the Commerce Clause did not authorize Congress to enact the "individual mandate" section of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that requires all individuals to buy health insurance, with an Ayn Rand… [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am by Allison Trzop
  Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Ingersoll-Rand Co., 14 P.3d 990, 995 (Alaska 2000) (§17); see also Munhoven v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, is “a watershed moment that dramatically alters the landscape of the gaming industry in the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
And yes, I know your three word response will be "Plessy v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 7:32 am by Joy Waltemath
And the union did not make a showing of irreparable harm: While a recent Rand Corporation study indicated that body cameras are associated with increased assaults against police, other studies have reached different conclusions (Boston Police Patrolmen’s Association, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am by Legal Beagle
An account forwarded to Rand Associates for independent audit revealed more than £70,000 of errors, later confirmed in the Auditor’s report to the court. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
Furthermore, we conclude that, because "the analysis employed by this [C]ourt in the prior appeal no longer reflects the current state of the law, the doctrine of law of the case should not be invoked to preclude reconsideration of" Charter Oak's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for compensatory damages (Szajna v Rand, 131 AD2d 840, 840; see Foley v Roche, 86 AD2d 887, lv denied 56 NY2d 507). [read post]