Search for: "State v. Rome" Results 181 - 200 of 592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
In a recent case called Regnier v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 1:52 am by Jan von Hein
In particular, the article discusses possible restrictions of the right to choose between the law of the state in which the damage occurred and the law of the state in which the event giving rise to the damage took place (Art. 7 No. 2 Brussels Ia Regulation and Art. 7 Rome II Regulation). [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by Brooke
 Also at Public Books is a review of Benjamin Peters' How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet.A Fiery and Furious People: a History of Violence in England by James Sharpe is reviewed in The Times Literary Supplement and the New Statesman.Mary Beard discusses her SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome in the Los Angeles Review of Books.Cornelia Hughes Dayton and Sharon V. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
The problem stems from an overbroad and poorly monitored federal regulation, upheld by the US Supreme Court in Thornburgh v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
On social issues, US Catholics were willing to reject Rome when they did not deem Rome’s reasons for its positions sufficiently persuasive. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:24 am
In 1895, the United States Supreme Court decided Coffin v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:06 am
Although no case like Lochner v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:06 pm by Jeralyn
The presumption of innocence goes back well before the United States, to the days of Ancient Greece and Rome. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 9:37 am
| Friday Fantasies| Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One)| HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio| Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme| Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 3:25 am by Apostolos Anthimos
But even when the EU regulates disputes between member states and third countries (for example, the Rome Regulations on applicable law), it does so, not to bind third countries to EU law -nor it could do so-, but to avoid divergent solutions among its member states in their relations with third countries. ? [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:50 am
            Or, if your plaintiff is trying to use dicta in Lance v. [read post]