Search for: "State v. Royal" Results 181 - 200 of 1,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Last month PR guru Max Clifford was ordered to pay the former Royal Butler Paul Burrell £5,000 compensation for the unauthorised disclosure of private information contained within a letter Mr Burrell had sent him. [read post]
Royal Dutch Shell, manages to raise an even broader question: Are there any substantive limits to the federal government’s power to regulate matters occurring outside and having nothing do with the United States? [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says the individuals do not have qualified immunity from First Amendment liability, which means the case can forge ahead.The case is Royal Crown Day Care, LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:27 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 361 (15 April 2008) London Borough of Wandsworth v Allison [2008] EWCA Civ 354 (15 April 2008) YB (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 360 (15 April 2008) High Court (Family Division) Nottingham City Council v G & Ors [2008] EWHC 540 (Fam) (18 March 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Office of Government Commerce v… [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The case of Banks v Cadwalladr concluded before Steyn J in the Royal Courts of Justice this week, with Cadwalladr arguing that her belief that the “covert relationship” between Banks and the Russian government was reasonable; the defence of public interest applies. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:12 am by David Oscar Markus
But I doubt that the proud men who wrote the charter of ourliberties would have been so eager to open their mouths for royal inspection. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:04 am
The Court of Appeal, in City & General (Holborn) Ltd v Royal Sun Alliance Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 911, was asked to consider whether the earlier decision to set aside an extension of time for service of a claim form (granted due to the claim being time-barred) was correct. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:50 am by SHG
  Under the 9th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:07 am by Laura Coogan, Olswang LLP
On 24 and 25 November 2014, the Supreme Court heard the case of R (Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]