Search for: "State v. Seale" Results 181 - 200 of 3,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm by DMLP Staff
NelsonCourt Name: United States District Court for the District of MarylandLegal Claims: Other McCall is a designer who creates parodies of the official seals of the National Security Agency ("NSA") and the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") for use on T-shirts, mugs and similar merchandise. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm by DMLP Staff
NelsonCourt Name: United States District Court for the District of MarylandLegal Claims: Other McCall is a designer who creates parodies of the official seals of the National Security Agency ("NSA") and the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") for use on T-shirts, mugs and similar merchandise. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 7:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It does so in the context of highly-publicized sexual misconduct allegations involving some well-known individuals, including Alan Dershowitz.The case is Brown v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:39 pm by Ralph L. Jacobson
An order obtained by a party sealing a record must specifically state the facts that support these findings. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Greatplains Finance LLC (D.N.J.): 1 Notice of Removal 1-2 State Court Complaint 51-1 Motion to Dismiss 61 Response Brief Sealed 64 Reply 72 DCT Order [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
 The United States filed its opposition on June 5, 2015. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:57 am
  Here's an e-mail from AG Hood's media office this morning:  Hello All,Just wanted to note that General Hood has been on record (more than once) as saying the ONLY thing under seal in the federal case, State Farm v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:51 am by Richard Renner
The court also concluded (pp. 19-20) that, "the FCA’s seal provisions are a proper subject of congressional legislation and do not intrude on 'the zone of judicial self-administration to such a degree as to prevent the judiciary from accomplishing its constitutionally assigned functions.'" Quoting United States v. [read post]