Search for: "State v. Si" Results 181 - 200 of 773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
OCT is the group behind the Juliana litigation, in addition to several cases brought against states in state courts. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am by admin
” The 1926 Supreme Court decision in The City of Euclid v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:49 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The specific test for justifying discrimination in the context of state benefits was set out in Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, where it was held that with questions of social and economic strategy the Court will generally respect the legislature’s policy choice unless it was “manifestly without reasonable foundation”. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:25 am by Aimee Denholm
On the question of jurisdiction, it was held that Sala v SSHD [2016] UKUT 411 had rightly been overruled by the Court of Appeal in a subsequent decision on the interpretation of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1003), reg 26. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:37 pm
S. 73, 80 (2002) (quoting United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
He too considered Bonnard v Perryman and Reynolds v Malocco, as well as the hugely-influential decision of Clarke J in Cogley v RTE [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
And Article 24 required Member States for provide for sanctions for breach of implementing legislation. [read post]