Search for: "State v. Siegel" Results 181 - 200 of 490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Law):Shital Prakash Kharat, Effect of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005 – Judicial Response, (February 6, 2017).Grant Robert Hooper, From the Magna Carta to Bentham to Modern Australian Judicial Review: Themes of Practicality and Spirituality, (Australian Institute of Administrative Law (AIAL) Forum, Vol. 84, pp. 22-44, 2016).From SSRN (LGBT Rights):Reva Siegel, Same-Sex Marriage and Backlash: Consensus, Conflict, and Constitutional Culture, (February 9, 2017).Susan Frelich… [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am by Jordan Brunner
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Lee v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am by Jim Sedor
The money followed a legal but circuitous route turbocharged by the 2014 ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 7:38 am by Amanda Frost
Linda Greenhouse and Reva Siegel addressed that issue at length in an article published shortly before the Supreme Court struck down a Texas statute regulating abortion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:52 pm by Priscilla Smith
  SeeGreenhouse and Siegel, Clinic Closings, at Part II.C.1. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:00 am by JB
On Friday, April 15th, the Yale Information Society Project will hold a conference at Yale Law School entitled, What Obergefell v. [read post]