Search for: "State v. Singh "
Results 181 - 200
of 619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am
A person can only be detained pending deportation if that detention is lawful under the well-known (to practitioners) Hardial Singh principles, which arise from a 1984 case of the same name. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
In M.B.Z. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm
The court reiterated the principles as set out in Jeynes v News Magazine Ltd [2008] EWCA, Civ. 130, as affirmed in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:18 am
Now, hot on the heels, is this case: Singh v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:31 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
655 (2015), available at SSRN. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Krauss, New Light on the History of Free Exercise Exemptions: The Debates in Two Eighteenth-Century State Legislatures, (Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 2022).Luke Boso, Religious Liberty, Discriminatory Intent, and the Status Quo Constitution, (Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper , Jan. 2023).Enrico Bonadio, Krishna Ravi Srinivas, Balaji Parthasarathy Iyengar & Atreya Choudhary, Gandhian Philosophy and Indian Intellectual Property,… [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:28 am
Supreme Court pointed this out in Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar v State of Maharashtra (2009). [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181-182 [1978]). [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181-182 [1978]). [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 6:39 am
[On March 5, 2019], in Singh v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 10:53 am
The post Justices schedule major cases on deference to federal agencies appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:36 am
Narasu Appa Mali v State of Bombay The petition in Narasu challenged validity of the Bombay Prevention of Bigamous Hindu Marriages Act, 1946 which sought to render bigamous marriages void as well as criminalize the offence of bigamy. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:05 am
In addition, the firm is among the counsel to the respondent in Air Wisconsin, and Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell is among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
The DOJ and Microsoft have both filed motions to dismiss as moot the seminal data privacy case before the Supreme Court this term, United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
The DOJ and Microsoft have both filed motions to dismiss as moot the seminal data privacy case before the Supreme Court this term, United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:24 am
United States
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
Reddy (nominated member of the Hyderabad Legislative Assembly, 1946-1947); and· V. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
RaveendranThe Supreme Court in Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs. [read post]