Search for: "State v. Sosa" Results 181 - 200 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 8:43 pm by John Bellinger
”  Repeatedly invoking the Supreme Court’s call for caution in Sosa, the Court emphasizes that the ATS is “no license for judicial innovation” and that “judicial restraint is demanded. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by An Hertogen
First, the US Supreme Court hearings in Kiobel v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm by John Bellinger
   This morning the Supreme Court granted cert in DaimlerChrysler AG v Bauman, an ATS suit against Daimler. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:49 pm by Lovechilde
  On the contrary, one of the main obligations it imposes on states is to protect against human rights abuses committed by non-state actors, including corporations. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:47 pm by Chimene Keitner
Suits will be dismissed if the state is an indispensable party under Republic of Philippines v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm by John Knox
For a couple of reasons, the presumption against extraterritoriality doesn’t apply neatly to ATS claims, as the Ninth and DC Circuits said in their 2011 decisions in Sarei v Rio Tinto and Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:21 am by Tobias Thienel
The scenario, then, was reasonably similar to that in the famous Alvarez-Machain case (see Sosa v Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004)). [read post]