Search for: "State v. Spikes"
Results 181 - 200
of 505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2008, 9:17 am
" In 2003, "Takeshi's Castle" was aired in the United States under the "MXC" name on the Spike television network. [read post]
5 May 2020, 2:53 pm
The case involves the state legislature’s attempt to rein in pension “spiking,” in which public employees increased their pensions by padding their final year or years of compensation. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
As of January 1, 2024, the State of Maryland’s new telemarketing law, the “Stop the Spam Calls Act of 2023,” officially became law. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:45 am
Member States may however allow a work to be used, without its author’s consent, for the purpose of caricature, parody or pastiche. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 10:46 am
In its 2001 Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 11:31 am
Summary of today’s Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 2:27 pm
According to the heirs and right holders of Willebrord Vandersteen, the author of Spike and Suzy, the reproduction infringes the copyright in the original cover. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:24 am
Last year, I used my own insurance renewal to illustrate the shocking spikes in the cost of homeowners insurance in the Sunshine State. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm
See Katz v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
United States, SCOTUS Blog (Nov. 14, 2014), http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/yates-v-united-states/. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:39 am
Last week, the Liberian flag state called for the IMO to issue a resolution or circular requiring early reporting of low-sulphur fuel availability by member states. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:41 pm
Texas DOT v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 10:05 pm
Supreme Court, and the Court vacated the judgment against him and remanded after its Second Amendment ruling in McDonald v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:07 am
Tags: McDonald's, obesity, on TV and radio, publicity Related posts Welcome Lars Larson listeners (0) Pelman v. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 7:24 am
In the case of Beauchamp v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
Provident Bank decision is substantively wrong, but that it will lead to less certainty and a spike in misapplication of the administrative exemption test under the FLSA (a fact we discussed further, in the context of the strain the decision creates between the federal and state law). [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
Provident Bank decision is substantively wrong, but that it will lead to less certainty and a spike in misapplication of the administrative exemption test under the FLSA (a fact we discussed further, in the context of the strain the decision creates between the federal and state law). [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
Sissel v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:42 am
Yet, LII sustained a traffic spike on decision day for Dobbs v. [read post]
