Search for: "State v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 257,343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:21 am by Tessa Shepperson
Propertymark also guide tenants on knowing their rights where a pet is concerned, and they state:- England – Landlords cannot accept a higher deposit for having a pet, but they can charge you extra rent for having a pet. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Michael Chatzipanagiotis
Ever since, the MC99 provisions have been an integral part of the EU legal order (C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA, para. 36), save for the provisions on cargo, for which competence rests with the EU Member States. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 4:45 pm by John Gotaskie
In fact, there are three key takeaways in Smith v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 3:14 pm
In state court, if you're assigned an "all-purpose" judge, you generally have to "paper" them (CCP 170.6) within 10 days. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]