Search for: "State v. Steward"
Results 181 - 200
of 261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 6:28 pm
In the case, Steward v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
” Roadcap v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:45 am
New Standard for Meal/Rest Periods: On April 12, 2012, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling on Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am
That was in Coyle v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
(For example, United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm
The coercion argument can be traced initially to a comment the Supreme Court made in a 1937 decision, Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
Take HHS v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:24 am
Because of the Texas Supreme Court's recent opinion in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:47 pm
" U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:08 am
Fedda v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:36 pm
Bottom line, the states want the Court to revive Butler and to expand the theory of coercion that the Court merely acknowledged in Dole and Steward Machine by relying heavily on Justice Kennedy’s concurrences and dissents that have expressed an interest in such an expansion. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
In the challenge by 26 states to Congress’s decision in the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid coverage — an expansion that the states claim will simply bust their budgets – the states are relying upon the so-called “coercion theory.” This has to do with the conditions that Congress tells states they must meet in order to qualify for federal funds to help pay for a public program. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:32 pm
In Whitserve, LLC. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:24 am
Supreme Court case of Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:33 am
Form 990 Flags - 990 asks re: significant changes to governing docs; diversion of assets; process for compensation determination Donor substantiation - contemporaneous written acknowledgment - must contain magic language or no deduction - http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1771.pdf Retroactive revocation of tax exemption - omission of material fact; operated in manner materially different from represented Louis Michelson - Incidental private benefit (permissible to charity) - see… [read post]
Texas Whistleblower Act: Is an internal grievance always required prior to a whistle-blower lawsuit?
12 Oct 2011, 6:57 pm
Steward, 139 S.W.3d 354, 357-58 (Tex. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:58 pm
See SFAT’s Decision (Wan Ten Lok and Yan Kwok Ting Sunny v SFC, Application No 8 and 9 of 2009, para 197). [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 11:42 am
In context, though, the irony is telling.* * * * * * *Justice Brennan, dissenting alas, in McCleskey v. [read post]
