Search for: "State v. V. M. T." Results 181 - 200 of 18,377
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm by Russell Knight
” A v M [2021] EWFC 89 Again, the agreement that created the hedge fund controls how and when the carried interest will be paid out to general partners. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
”)Did he get off on the wrong foot there ….# # #DECISIONC. v M. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:13 am by Dylan Gibbs
I’m hiring students for part-time research and writing work. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I don't think I'm being hyperbolic when I assert these developments threaten free speech on this planet. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:08 pm
" (Article V, Section 8).I'm quite confident that others knew about this quirk in the California pardon scheme, but I didn't. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The Daubert decision held out some opportunity to challenge the admissibility of testimony that silicone implants led to either the production of a silicone-specific antibody, or the induction of t-cell mediated immunogenicity from silicone (or resulting silica) exposure. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Foran, Discrimination and Manifestation of Belief: Higgs v Farmor's School [2023] EAT 89, (Industrial Law Journal, Forthcoming).Jack M. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm by Josh Blackman
I am very familiar with this limbo, as the Defense Distributed case is stuck somewhere between the Garden State and the Lone Star State. [read post]