Search for: "State v. Wages"
Results 181 - 200
of 9,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 8:28 am
Labor Code section 226 states that California employers must provide employees with accurate itemized wage statements. [read post]
8 May 2007, 3:00 pm
" Giuliano argued that his statutory wage claim is an unwaivable claim because "[t]he right to be paid wages earned is part of the public policy of the State of California and is not waivable. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:21 am
The app puts federal wage-hour law, as well as that for many states, at users’ fingertips. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 9:53 pm
In this week’s case (Laxda v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 4:41 pm
One of these exemptions is the “professional exemption,” which was analyzed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Dybach v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 1:18 pm
Parrish pitted a Washington State hotel against a chambermaid, Elsie Parrish, who claimed that she was owed the state’s minimum wage. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:17 am
In that decision, the Court of Appeals held that California’s wage and hour, and overtime laws apply to offshore drilling facilities located in offshore waters adjacent to the State of California off the coast of Santa Barbara. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:33 pm
Temple v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:52 am
Likewise, in United States Dep’t of Labor v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
Dare v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 11:33 am
Employers Relied on Dobin v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 12:56 pm
There is a 1974 Supreme Court decision, Kokoszka v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
"]; Alcala v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 4:35 am
The case is entitled Port of Tacoma v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:22 am
United States Trustee, 540 U.S. 526, 530-31 (2004). [7] See Entergy Corp.l v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:48 pm
Starbucks Corporation (S234969) on whether California wage and hour law recognizes the de minimis doctrine established by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:25 pm
In Alcazar v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:38 am
Hauser v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:03 am
Spelfogel On December 17, 2012, in Crocker v Townsend Oil, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court invalidated a settlement agreement, waiver and release to the extent it purported to release claims under the Massachusetts Wage and Hour Laws, but did not expressly include that statute by name among the claims being released. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
In Beichler v. [read post]
