Search for: "State v. Wales"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that decision last month. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:00 am
The importance of this point was stressed by the Supreme Court in the case of Owens v Owens. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm
The state of libel litigation in England and Wales in 2011 can be summarised like this: no jury trials, not much media involvement and similar numbers of cases to 2010. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:59 am
When Lloyd had written to Lardken stating its interpretation of the licence agreement, Lardken had responded disagreeing. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
Strong AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:58 pm
In an earlier post, I looked at a recent judgment of the England and Wales High Court by Justice Munby in Hashem v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:01 am
In Really Virtual Co Ltd v UK Intellectual Property Office [2012] EWHC 1086 (Ch), John Baldwin QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Patents Court, England and Wales, on 2 May. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:38 pm
On November 19th the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) ruled on the scope of a contractual non-exclusive jurisdiction clause in the context of a damage claim for breach of EU competition law (Ryanair Ltd v Esso Italiana Srl [2013] EWCA Civ 1450). [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am
On 22 June 2017, the Administrative Court of the High Court of England and Wales declared the two passages in the guidance under challenge to be unlawful. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:43 pm
This case concerns an appeal [2010] EWCA Civ. 33 from the August 2008 judgment in Eli Lilly & Co. v Human Genome Sciences Inc., [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat), wherein Mr. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:43 pm
This case concerns an appeal [2010] EWCA Civ. 33 from the August 2008 judgment in Eli Lilly & Co. v Human Genome Sciences Inc., [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat), wherein Mr. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:05 am
The next court to look at this will presumably the United States District for the Southern District of Florida at next year's Motorola v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
The rules for the operation of the injunctions for which the Member States must provide are a matter for national law, but those measures must be effective and dissuasive;3. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:31 am
The Secretary of State brought the forum bar provisions into force in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in October 2013, but he did not bring them into force in Scotland. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm
See Tamkin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:03 pm
See Tamkin v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Today we revisit the case of the day from October 28, 2011, Health Science Distributors Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 8:17 pm
College of Law of England and Wales Brooklyn Law School v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:44 am
Koch v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:55 pm
" Associated Newspapers have stated that they "categorically deny that the duchess's letter was edited in any way that changed its meaning. [read post]
