Search for: "State v. Wales" Results 181 - 200 of 1,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am by Florian Mueller
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that decision last month. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:00 am by Beth Duffy
The importance of this point was stressed by the Supreme Court in the case of Owens v Owens. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The state of libel litigation in England and Wales in 2011 can be summarised like this: no jury trials, not much media involvement and similar numbers of cases to 2010. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:59 am by war
When Lloyd had written to Lardken stating its interpretation of the licence agreement, Lardken had responded disagreeing. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:58 pm
In an earlier post, I looked at a recent judgment of the England and Wales High Court by Justice Munby in Hashem v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:01 am
In Really Virtual Co Ltd v UK Intellectual Property Office [2012] EWHC 1086 (Ch), John Baldwin QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the Patents Court, England and Wales, on 2 May. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:38 pm by Marta Requejo
On November 19th the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) ruled on the scope of a contractual non-exclusive jurisdiction clause in the context of a damage claim for breach of EU competition law (Ryanair Ltd v Esso Italiana Srl [2013] EWCA Civ 1450). [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am by CMS
On 22 June 2017, the Administrative Court of the High Court of England and Wales declared the two passages in the guidance under challenge to be unlawful. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:43 pm
This case concerns an appeal [2010] EWCA Civ. 33 from the August 2008 judgment in Eli Lilly & Co. v Human Genome Sciences Inc., [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat), wherein Mr. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:43 pm
This case concerns an appeal [2010] EWCA Civ. 33 from the August 2008 judgment in Eli Lilly & Co. v Human Genome Sciences Inc., [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat), wherein Mr. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:05 am by Florian Mueller
The next court to look at this will presumably the United States District for the Southern District of Florida at next year's Motorola v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
    The rules for the operation of the injunctions for which the Member States must provide are a matter for national law, but those measures must be effective and dissuasive;3. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:31 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Secretary of State brought the forum bar provisions into force in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in October 2013, but he did not bring them into force in Scotland. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Today we revisit the case of the day from October 28, 2011, Health Science Distributors Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:55 pm
" Associated Newspapers have stated that they "categorically deny that the duchess's letter was edited in any way that changed its meaning. [read post]