Search for: "State v. johnny"
Results 181 - 200
of 450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2015, 9:00 am
The first case, Merrick v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:39 am
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Propensity to change verdict Johnny Ray Hungerford, Jr., (“Appellant”) was convicted of first-degree assault by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Howard County on July 24, 2014. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 5:46 pm
On October 19, 2009, a grand jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City indicted appellant, Johnny Butler (“Butler”), along with one ... [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:29 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held oral argument yesterday in Jones v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The beginning of the story that forms the basis for the preliminary ruling of the CJEU in Diageo Brands BV v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
It is styled, Johnnie Shannon v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:58 pm
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:58 pm
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:25 am
Fortenberry, John Fortenberry, and Johnny Fortenberry)Administrative Proceeding File No.: 3-15858Case filed: April 28, 2014Initial Decision: March 2, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 7, 2015 5/29/2015 8/27/2015 2015-47 SEC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:06 pm
TLC had argued that Count III of the beneficiaries’ state court complaint and Count V of the counterclaim alleged that Johnny and Harley Langdale had breached fiduciary duties they owed as TLC directors, with respect to which, the company argued, both TLC and the individuals were entitled to have their defenses paid under TLC’s D&O insurance policy. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:06 pm
TLC had argued that Count III of the beneficiaries’ state court complaint and Count V of the counterclaim alleged that Johnny and Harley Langdale had breached fiduciary duties they owed as TLC directors, with respect to which, the company argued, both TLC and the individuals were entitled to have their defenses paid under TLC’s D&O insurance policy. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:40 pm
A Daubert motion is the outcome of a 1993 Supreme Court case, Daubert v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 10:53 am
In the recent case of Depuy Orthopaedics v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:35 pm
., both of Indianapolis, Indiana, illegally intercepted and broadcast the Saul Alvarez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:14 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:10 am
Presumably for these reasons, in the 13 years since we decided Penry v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:43 pm
The story, though, starts in the state court where Johnny Baca was on trial for murder. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
That in itself is a heinous crime BY the State to deny a minor the legal protections and immunities to which one is, and has always been, entitled. [read post]
