Search for: "Stephens v. Does et al" Results 181 - 200 of 352
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
The sequel case is American Tradition Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:14 am by Steve Hall
  Here's the Court's summary: Stephen Michael West, et al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The original article on which this revised version is based was originally written before the initial decisio in FDIC v Perry was reported (about which decision, refer here). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:40 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is American Tradition Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:48 am by Lyle Denniston
   The two Secret Service agents who appealed a case to try to stop a lawsuit against them did not need the Court to go that far in order for them to win, and it was not apparent that most of the Justices thought they had to do so to reach a decision in the specific case of Reichle, et al., v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am by Steve Davies
Dale Robertson, Civil No. 89-160 and Washington Contract Loggers Assoc. et al., v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court had heard argument in Douglas, et al., v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:11 am by Lyle Denniston
The 6-2 decision (with Justice Elena Kagan not taking part) came in the case of Golan, et al., v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Fox Television Stations, et al. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The government’s attack on the Carlin recitation led to the most important constitutional ruling so far on broadcast “indecency” — the Court’s 1978 decision in FCC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm by Pace Law School Library
L. 807-811 (2011).Thomas, Seth M., et al. 2009-2010 environmental law survey. 44 Ind. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
At 10 a.m. next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on Mayo Collaborative Services, et al., v. [read post]