Search for: "Stephens v. Shields" Results 181 - 200 of 263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 5:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"Stephen Bergstein, an attorney for the parents, said he probably won't appeal. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:31 am by Amy Howe
A second major question at today’s argument followed from the Supreme Court’s 2017 ruling in Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
He argues this, despite the fact that Hammond did not create her own first-party SNT to potentially shield her income from such a benefit determination. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
UCLA’s Stephen Bainbridge says no way – and also says that Sorkin & Gamble’s arguments amount to “a mass dump of uninformed silliness. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:50 am by Lyle Denniston
Commentary When the Supreme Court meets in private Friday to discuss Snyder v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
Varela, 17-988, the Quality Systems petition prominently notes that the late Judge Stephen Reinhardt was on the panel that decided the case. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am by David Kopel
Representative Alexander Stephens (D‑Ga.) introduced a bill into the thirty-fifth Congress to create the Territory of Jefferson, which would comprise much of modern Colorado plus a great deal of land to the north. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 5:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Consequently, where the allegations by the petitioner are disputed as being contrived and suggest that the petitioner is seeking to manufacture instances of spousal misconduct, a hearing should be held in order to ensure that the court process has not been impermissibly invoked as a sword rather than a shield, as held in the celebrated case of Chieco v. [read post]