Search for: "Steven Mazie" Results 181 - 200 of 530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2021, 5:34 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Friday morning read: Senate committee approves legislation to put Supreme Court hearings on camera (Josh Gerstein, Politico) A Cheerleader Lands an F on Snapchat, but a B+ in Court (Justin Driver, The New York Times) The Supreme Court decides not to light the housing market on fire (Ian Millhiser, Vox) The Fulton Opinion and the Originalist Future of Religious Freedom (John McGinnis, Law & Liberty) America’s Supreme Court is less one-sided than liberals feared ($)… [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 7:12 am by James Romoser
(Michael Schaffer, Politico) The Sins of the High Court’s Supreme Catholics (James Carroll, The New Yorker) America tussles over a newly fashionable constitutional theory (Steven Mazie, The Economist) Religious schools haven’t yet sought public funding in Maine after Supreme Court decision (Robbie Feinberg, Maine Public) Vogue on KBJ and ACB (Josh Blackman, The Volokh Conspiracy) The post The morning read for Friday, Aug. 19 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 6:17 am by James Romoser
(Nicholas Lemann, The New Yorker) Progressives Look to Next Term to Keep Focus on Supreme Court (Madison Alder, Bloomberg Law) How the Supreme Court could decimate reproductive rights without overruling Roe (Steven Mazie & Melissa Murray, The Washington Post) The post The morning read for Tuesday, July 27 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 4:30 am by James Romoser
Here’s what 3 reform proposals would do (Taylor Mooney, CBS News) This Is What Judicial Activism Looks Like on the Supreme Court (Linda Greenhouse, The New York Times) Justice Thomas’ Thought Experiment on Novel Issues With Social Media, Free Speech (GianCarlo Canaparo, The Daily Signal) Gender War: A challenge to male-only draft registration lands at America’s Supreme Court (Steven Mazie, The Economist) Last Hurrah for the Minimalist Court? [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:58 am by James Romoser
($) (Steven Mazie, The Economist) The post The morning read for Thursday, Feb. 3 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie discusses libertarian support for the challenges to the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:31 am by Amy Howe
”  And writing for The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that, “[i]f the justices entered the courtroom on April 28th sure of their votes in this year’s biggest and trickiest fourth-amendment cases, they hid their certainty brilliantly. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on the grant in Moore comes from Lisa Soronen at the NCSL Blog and Steven Mazie for The Economist. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am by Amy Howe
”  At The Economist, Steven Mazie suggests that the Court “quietly pave[d] the way for big changes” in the future, and he predicts that questions involving same-sex marriage are likely to return to the Court very soon. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:14 am by Amy Howe
”   And at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie discusses what he regards as a concession by Douglas Laycock, who argued on behalf of the town residents challenging the prayers, with regard to atheists; Mazie notes that Laycock “is asking the justices to instruct Greece to change its prayer practice in a way that would continue to coercively offend one of his clients. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie discusses Monday’s orders denying review of seven petitions arising out of challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog and Steven Mazie in The Economist. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:55 am by Amy Howe
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America Blog, Steven Mazie discusses the Court’s decision in Comptroller v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:02 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the latest proceedings for this blog; other coverage and analysis come from Marty Lederman at Balkinization, Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law, Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, and Leland E. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 5:40 pm by Howard Bashman
” At the “Democracy in America” blog of The Economist, Steven Mazie has a post titled “At a crossroads: The Supreme Court will review abortion-clinic rules in Louisiana; The case gives the new conservative majority its first chance to chip away at abortion rights. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:29 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie notes that the “unheralded but important role of the district-court judge was the theme of Chief Justice John Roberts’ end-of-year report,” but that “in his homily, the chief justice judiciously ignored the elephant in his own courtroom—the empty chair Senate Republicans successfully blockaded after Antonin Scalia’s death last February” — and “papered over the political fight concerning… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:14 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist, Steven Mazie previews the upcoming Term, suggesting that, after “springtime rulings friendly to gay rights and Obamacare, the Supreme Court is likely to swing back to the right when the justices dust off their robes and return to work on October 5th. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:59 am by Amy Howe
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie concludes that the Court’s ruling in the case of former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell “is a relief not only to Mr McDonnell and his wife but to untold politicians across the country who may have used their offices to pursue questionable deals and exchanges. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:26 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie argues that the Zika virus may trigger renewed debate about the Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court is considering whether a commercial fisherman can be convicted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s “anti-shredding” provision for ordering that seventy-two undersized fish be thrown overboard, comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist, Jonathan Keim at the National Review Online, and Mark Miller at the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog. [read post]