Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice"
Results 181 - 200
of 700
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that Monday’s decision in Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, which became known as “the Case of the Frozen Trucker. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Background: State Sovereign Immunity The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
” In a post on Linked In, Dan Cotter reviews retired Justice John Paul Stevens’ recent memoir. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
That amendment provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Tuesday’s oral argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
This morning, the justices will hear 80 minutes of argument in one of the term’s marquee cases, Department of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
The real importance, in my view, is that a series of positive actions by employees of the state actively furthered and facilitated his murder and that, in the aftermath of the murder, there was a relentless attempt to defeat the ends of justice. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
As to Miller’s position that Congress has not authorized Mueller’s work by statute, the court simply pointed to United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am
United States Postal Service, in which they will consider whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 8:05 am
Under Brady v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
United States). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 3:50 am
On Friday, the Supreme Court removed Department of Commerce v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In 1987, Marshall was the deciding vote for the 5-4 majority in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 3:30 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Selmont, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Counsel for the Government. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
More troubling still is the possibility of lulling the public into thinking the United States can adequately address climate change without federal action. [read post]
