Search for: "Steward v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
The coercion argument can be traced initially to a comment the Supreme Court made in a 1937 decision, Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:24 am by John McFarland
Because of the Texas Supreme Court's recent opinion in Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:36 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
Bottom line, the states want the Court to revive Butler and to expand the theory of coercion that the Court merely acknowledged in Dole and Steward Machine by relying heavily on Justice Kennedy’s concurrences and dissents that have expressed an interest in such an expansion. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
In the challenge by 26 states to Congress’s decision in the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid coverage — an expansion that the states claim will simply bust their budgets – the states are relying upon the so-called “coercion theory.”  This has to do with the conditions that Congress tells states they must meet in order to qualify for federal funds to help pay for a public program. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:33 am by Gene Takagi
Form 990 Flags - 990 asks re: significant changes to governing docs; diversion of assets; process for compensation determination  Donor substantiation - contemporaneous written acknowledgment - must contain magic language or no deduction - http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1771.pdf Retroactive revocation of tax exemption - omission of material fact; operated in manner materially different from represented Louis Michelson - Incidental private benefit (permissible to charity) - see… [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:58 pm by Alex Duperouzel
See SFAT’s Decision (Wan Ten Lok and Yan Kwok Ting Sunny v SFC, Application No 8 and 9 of 2009, para 197). [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 11:42 am by Jeff Gamso
  In context, though, the irony is telling.* * * * * * *Justice Brennan, dissenting alas, in McCleskey v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:30 am by Michael Scutt
 For instance, consider the Virgin Atlantic air hostesses/stewards sacked in 2008 for using Facebook to describe their passengers as “chavs” and saying the planes were full of cockroaches. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:08 pm by Bill Merkel
Hamilton in his Report of the Bank and Marshall in McColloch v. [read post]