Search for: "Story v. Newspapers, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Goldhar v Haaretz (2016 ONCA 515), the Court of Appeal of Ontario cleared the way for a Canadian billionaire who owns an Israeli football team to sue a leading Israeli newspaper for libel. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:41 pm by Nabeel Ahmad
A story of a company suffering a data breach tops newspaper headlines almost daily. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The biggest media law story of the week was the decision of the Supreme Court to reinstate the injunction in the case of PJS v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
The complainant alleged that the Calgary Herald had violated PIPA in its publication of a news story. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Facebook lets users as speakers communicate quickly and effectively with friends and family, sharing personal thoughts, political ideas, and news stories. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation IPSO have upheld a privacy complaint against the Argus over a story entitled “Update: teenager arrested on suspicion of fraud following Bestival ticket upset. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
Petrushova founded Respublika in 2000, and the newspaper has been published online since September 2008. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The judgement of HHJ Moloney QC in the curious international harassment case of Power Places Tours Inc & Ors v Free Spirit [2015] EWHC 3886 (QB) given on 10 December 20 [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
For a more complete transcript, see the appendix to Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
  There is a story about the case on CBC News. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 3:46 am by INFORRM
The respondents pointed out that in AAA v Associated Newspapers  and Weller v Associated Newspapers; children have been awarded damages despite being oblivious to their privacy rights being violated. [read post]