Search for: "Streets v. United States of America" Results 181 - 200 of 925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Those challenges have alleged that Black defendants are more likely than White defendants to get death sentences, even when they commit comparable crimes.In 1972, the United States Supreme Court’s Furman v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am by Lyle Denniston
United States, and a companion case, Sandlin v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 11:19 am by John Floyd
”   The current President of the United States, Donald J. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am by Justin Cole
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am by Guest Blogger
You in the United Nations are your brothers’ and sisters’ keepers in America, and you have the power to help us get justice for my brother George Floyd. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:22 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Justice White set out the difference in roles as clearly as anyone ever has, with emphasis on our special duty, in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
It thus effectively overruled State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm by William Appleton
Václav Bartuška, the Czech ambassador-at-large for Energy Security.. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:17 am by Ashby Jones
That leaves the one factual claim in Obama's brief reference to the decision: the age of the law the court voided in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
GILTI is meant to ensure that, regardless of where a U.S. company does business in the world, its foreign subsidiaries pay at least a minimum rate of income tax, if not to other countries, then to the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
(stating Supreme Court's Hall Street decision “is unequivocal that the grounds upon which vacatur may be based as listed in § 10 are exclusive”); In re Poly-America,L.P., 262 S.W.3d 337, 362 (Tex. 2008) (Brister, J., dissenting) (“Both federal and state law require courts to enforce an arbitrator's decision, no matter what it is, with very few exceptions. [read post]