Search for: "Strong v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 7,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2008, 9:55 am
Yesterday's Forward reports that Jewish organizations-- traditionally strong proponents of church-state separation-- are now splitting over how hard to press on Establishment Clause issues. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:10 pm by Richard M. Re
United States (decided 2011 & 2014) and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 8:05 am
In a 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court held in Rita v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:07 pm
In a brief opinion, the 11th Circuit found for the government and reversed the district court:  In United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 2:06 am by Gherson Immigration
The Supreme Court gave a strong policy reason for this stating that refugee status “is a matter of significance and engages this country’s international obligations. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 1:51 pm
But love 'em or hate 'em, you've got to admire footnote 1 in CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:55 am by Karuna Nundy
By adopting a strong version of the Commonwealth Media Principles, member States may stand together and hold each other accountable. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 7:13 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently affirmed dismissal of a securities class action complaint based on the PSLRA pleadings standard clarified by the United States Supreme Court in Tellabs. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
” Smith relied on an earlier case, United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:06 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) was a landmark civil rights case in which the United States Supreme Court declared Virginia’s anti-miscegenation statutes unconstitutional, overturning Pace v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or consent to… [read post]