Search for: "Sts v. Ct" Results 181 - 200 of 1,177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2021, 9:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
See “Federal Court Authorizes Service of Process via Twitter” (discussing St. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Ct. will take up the question, in the Cincinnati prior restraint case in which we filed an amicus brief.] [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Fink, 51A.D.3d424, 425 [l st Dept. 2008] (granting motion to dismiss); But see Cruciata v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
One of the most confounding situations faced by corporate taxpayers engaged in a Louisiana income tax audit is the receipt of preliminary workpapers that disallow interest expense deductions with no opportunity to prove that the interest expense is properly deductible because it is directly attributable to the production of apportionable income. [read post]