Search for: "Sue Neil" Results 181 - 200 of 602
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Brinna Ludwig
In the majority opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote that “it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Doe and reverse a lower court decision that allowed a policeman who was injured by an unknown attacker at a Black Lives Matter protest to sue the protest’s organizer; they argue that “the Fifth Circuit’s opinion handed a terrible weapon to would-be censors. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” For The New York Times, Neil Vigdor reports that Bobby Moore, “[a] Texas inmate who spent nearly 40 years on death row and was at the center of a U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Brinna Ludwig
Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch contended in a dissenting opinion that California needed to justify the difference between religious gatherings and essential services. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Bank, the court held 5-4 that a participant in a defined-benefit pension fund that meets minimum-funding criteria cannot sue the fund managers when he has not actually suffered any financial injury. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:31 pm by Dana Muir
After the district court held that Thole and Smith had Article III standing to sue the fiduciaries, U.S. [read post]
18 May 2020, 10:37 am by Amy Howe
In an opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the court began by acknowledging that, as a general rule, laws only apply prospectively. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Both Parties Wonder: How much do conventions even matter anymore? [read post]
6 May 2020, 11:43 am by Amy Howe
Justice Neil Gorsuch observed that the argument in this case rests on the idea that the government has exceeded its statutory authority. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court held that a plaintiff who sues for racial discrimination in contracting under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am by Amy Howe
Justice Neil Gorsuch issued a statement regarding the denial, which was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:25 pm by admin
  That is, if you are late on your credit card, they cannot sue you until at least June 27. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:25 pm by admin
  That is, if you are late on your credit card, they cannot sue you until at least June 27. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:28 am by Amy Howe
Significantly, although Justices Clarence Thomas (who argued in his dissent in the Texas case that the abortion providers lacked a right to sue) and Neil Gorsuch did not ask any questions, neither Roberts nor Kavanaugh seemed to express any interest in the standing question, suggesting that there may not be five votes to dismiss the case on this ground. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Finally, Justice Neil Gorsuch filed a statement respecting the denial of cert criticizing the idea of deferring to agency interpretations of a criminal statute. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” The editorial board of The New York Times worries that if the court rules that abortion providers don’t have the right to sue on behalf of their patients, “[i]t’d be a sly way of rolling back women’s rights by limiting their access to the legal system. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost pushes back against Justices Neil Gorsuch’s and Clarence Thomas’ recent assertions that “so-called universal injunctions [are] a recent development, contrary to historical practice and constitutional limits on judicial power. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
., 18-349, involving employers’ need to make accommodations to their employees’ religious observance; Alito, joined by Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch, filed an opinion concurring in the denial. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:55 am by Amy Howe
Earlier in the case, the providers stress, the state agreed that the clinic had a right to sue, and it didn’t raise any objection to the providers’ right to sue until the providers filed their petition for Supreme Court review. [read post]