Search for: "Sullivan v. Price" Results 181 - 200 of 286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
By allowing indirect purchasers who had no standing to sue under their state's antitrust laws to be part of the settlement class, the appellate majority has created a “come one, come all” environment that “sets the class action ship in [the Ninth] Circuit badly adrift,” the dissent argued.The decision is Sullivan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  The same day the Court of Appeal (the Master of the Rolls, Sullivan and Black LJJ) will hear an application for permission to appeal in the case of Hutcheson v Popdog Ltd. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 1:12 pm by Wystan M. Ackerman
Coffee said we should all keep our eyes out for the Third Circuit’s forthcoming en banc opinion in Sullivan v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:27 am by Jeff Gamso
He's the guy who got screwed by high priced lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell who dropped the ball on his case. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
I just received this memo from our friends at Sullivan & Cromwell discussing the release. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:56 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3p9d9yn (Chris Dale) How to Choose an eDiscovery Tool and eDiscovery Vendor - http://tinyurl.com/3e6jy35 (Dera Nevin) Jane Doe v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:11 am by Eoin Daly
This was emphatically established in the early case NUR v Sullivan [1947] IR 77, where it was held that workers in a particular industry could not be forced to join only the trade union determined by a statutory tribunal. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 9:03 pm by Michael O'Hear
 However, the Court now has an ideal opportunity to limit to this rule in Maples v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:13 am by Mandelman
The latest decisions from our nation’s courts, including the Massachusetts Supreme Court “Ibanez” decision, Kemp v. [read post]