Search for: "Support FF"
Results 181 - 200
of 242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2023, 12:01 am
Writers sit watching a stranger’s search engine terms being typed in real time, a voyeuristic peek into that person’s most private thoughts. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:18 am
The report cherry-picks facts to support its views, and ignores facts that don’t. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 9:20 pm
Under these circumstances, the individual may self-certify that they are unable or unavailable to work under both items (dd) and (ff) of Section2102(a)(3)(A)(ii)(I) of the CARES Act. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 4:05 am
The report cherry-picks facts to support its views, and ignores facts that don’t. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am
Law §349 et ff. as per the Terms and Conditions) PLAINTIFF AND THE CLASSES v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 5:51 am
I haven't seen any support for the contention that there is a loophole that leaves an American contractor's attack on an American outside the scope of criminal prosecution, as some left-wing blogs have claimed. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, G 5/83 ([…] and A 54(5) EPC 2000, which according to the EBA in G 2/08 [5.9 ff.] is considered to fill the lacuna in the EPC 1973 which had been filled in a praetorian way by the EBA with G 5/83 and the case law based on that decision) has consistently been interpreted by the boards as not providing for the patentability of uses in any of the methods recited in A 52(4) EPC 1973 (or A 53(c) EPC 2000) involving means that are a “device” (see for example T 1314/05… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
To ensure compliance with the Act, we recommend that dietary supplement manufacturers carefully draft their labeling claims and carefully review the support for each claim to make sure that the support relates to the specific product and claim, is scientifically sound, and is adequate in the context of the surrounding body of evidence. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:04 pm
I. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
FFS. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
There are some interesting cases on when general references can sufficiently identify a plaintiff to support a claim of defamation at common law or for infringement of data protection rights pursuant to the GDPR. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
Sons of Confederate Veterans, two Supreme Court cases in support. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am
FFS. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
(c) The responsible development and use of AI require a commitment to supporting American workers. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm
Today, T 116/18 was published on the Recent Decisions pages of the Boards of Appeal, referring the following questions to the EBA:The following questions are referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision.If for acknowledgement of inventive step the patent proprietor relies on a technical effect and has submitted evidence, such as experimental data, to prove such an effect, this evidence not having been public before the filing date of the patent in suit and having been filed after… [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Thus, on August 15, 2014, PhRMA filed an amicus curiae brief in Solis in support of the defendant’s motion to dismiss, arguing that the conduct in question was protected by the First Amendment, and therefore could not be the subject of an FCA (or any other type of) action.PhRMA first placed Solissolely in the constitutional cross-hairs as a case alleging that the distribution of published, peer-reviewed scientific arguments could not possibly involve anything… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:06 pm
05 November 2014Click here for the latest articles on Condo Hotels High end hotel development in 2015 Almost every developer of a high end or luxury hotel in 2015 will at least consider using the condo hotel approach as a financing technique for new development, conversion or adaptive reuse projects. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:08 am
It’s 2021 FFS. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
FFS. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm
The closeness of the facts to a "bargain" are a factor in the ultimate resolution of the case: see Robert Walker LJ in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, [2003] 1 P & CR 8 at [41] ff especially at [45]. [read post]
