Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
Hold those people responsible.The rest of the court fully joined an opinion by Souter which says, in essence, "No they couldn't do that. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
In the Supreme Court of GeorgiaDecided: March 10, 2008 S07A1486. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:21 am
If one peruses various of the comment threads to posts about the Supreme Court's decision last Thursday in Boumediene (see, for example, the comments to this post or to this one), one finds a similar criticism of Justice Kennedy's opinion repeatedly echoed in various places -- that "foreign enemy combatants" are not part of "We the People," and so therefore are undeserving of constitutional… [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
The case reached the Supreme Court in 1910 and was decided in 1911. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm
The Court also observed that the Fourth Amendment was historically viewed as embodying a concern for governmental trespass to a person's person, property, papers and "effects. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:27 am
Communication to the publicAs for the right of communication to the public, the Court observed that there clearly was a new communication here, given the breadth of people to whom the works could be shown online, and this required the authorisation of the works' authors or the owners of the copyright therein. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:13 am
After the California Supreme Court decided In re Tobacco II, holding that Proposition 64's injury requirements do not apply to absent class members, it directed the Second District to reconsider its decision in light of the new opinion. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:43 am
Buchanan In a recent Dorf on Law column, I offered a parenthetical observation at the end of the opening paragraph: "Ah, remember those halcyon days when people who tried to be sensitive to non-Christians' sensibilities were accused of waging a War on Christmas -- instead of today's preference on the right to attack non-conservatives as pedophiles?! [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 9:40 am
”Kessler notes the special importance of accuracy for Supreme Court Justices. [read post]
31 May 2007, 9:06 am
In a prior post, we described some of the comments made by some experienced Supreme Court practitioners on proposed revisions to the Court's rules at a forum hosted by the Georgetown Supreme Court Institute. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:53 am
"Glenn [Loury] disputes this, while observing that conservatives have certainly benefited over the years from the Court's pro-abortion rulings. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:53 am
That is indeed rape, the Iowa Supreme Court said State v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 11:45 am
There's an argument to be made that having cameras in the court makes more sense than allowing an audience in the courtroom; cameras, after all, can't engage in outbursts, but they would allow millions of people, rather than mere dozens, to observe the proceedings. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 5:03 am
A.R.'s interests in continuity of education and contact with other family members and Sam's interest in parenting A.R. are significant and justify the trial court's custody order.I find no surprise in how the Indiana Supreme Court handled the constitutional issue. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 8:31 am
People are having their rights denied simply because they don't know how to properly present their cases to the court. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 7:50 am
That's the title of an article in this week's Dallas Observer, the New Times-owned alt-weekly, examining the impact of this month's electoral sweep in Dallas County (here) on a high visibility death penalty case. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:36 am
That's the title of a Florida News Service report from the Monday edition of the Jacksonville Observer. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 12:53 am
The Court was designated as the first IP case guidance research base in China, with the approval of the Supreme People’s Court. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 3:03 pm
The Third District Appellate Court of California's Court of Appeals has just issued People v. [read post]
