Search for: "T MOBILE USA INC"
Results 181 - 200
of 454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256, 1279 (11th Cir. 2009) (recommending that “district courts make it a usual practice to direct plaintiffs to present feasible trial plans”); James D. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 10:16 am
And, more recently, T-Mobile USA, Inc. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 9:27 pm
T-Mobile USA, Inc. 407 F. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Jackson (read more here) AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
The company is offering a one-day, free access pass that won't require a credit card. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:21 am
We forecast that the employees and Stryker will be arguing regarding the proper choice of law for this dispute, as California law and Pennsylvania law are rather different when it comes to the mobility of employees and what employees can and can't do having executed a contract restricting their post-resignation activities.We'll keep an eye on this one for you. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:32 pm
Baer has held a number of high-level positions at the Federal Trade Commission, including director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition.Under Pozen’s brief leadership, the Antitrust Division challenged the now-abandoned merger of AT&T Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., App. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:37 am
In T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:37 am
In T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (June 22, 2007) (First Appellate District, Division Five) (another case invalidating a no-class-action arbitration clause) In re: Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC Mortgage Servicing Litigation, ___ F.3d ___ (7th Cir. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 11:39 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256 (2d Cir. 2009), the Ninth Circuit held that “Congress intended the usual and long-standing principles apply – post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 7:26 am
T-Mobile Agrees to $48 million Settlement Over Alleged Misleading “Unlimited” Data Plan T-Mobile USA Inc. has reached a settlement with the FCC to pay $48 million to resolve claims that the company failed to sufficiently disclose that its unlimited data plans included constraints on data speed. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:17 am
NARB Recommends Changes to T-Mobile Claims The National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) recommended that T-Mobile USA, Inc. improve its disclosures to customers related to its “Ditch and Switch” campaign, as well as either alter or discontinue claims capping consumer reimbursements. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256, 1268 n.12 (11th Cir. 2009); Louisiana v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
In T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 7:27 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:29 am
Discount: AT&T Inc. can lower the price it pays for T-Mobile USA Inc. if the remedies requested by regulators become too expensive, according to three people with direct knowledge of the purchase contract, Bloomberg reports. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Briefly: ACSblog and Concurring Opinions have further commentary on Tuesday’s oral argument in AT&T Mobility Services v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:03 am
Last month, three current and former employees sued T-Mobile USA Inc., claiming they were required to use company-issued smart phones to respond to work messages after hours without pay. [read post]
