Search for: "T-MOBILE, USA, Inc." Results 181 - 200 of 454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (June 22, 2007) (First Appellate District, Division Five) (another case invalidating a no-class-action arbitration clause) In re: Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC Mortgage Servicing Litigation, ___ F.3d ___ (7th Cir. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 11:39 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256 (2d Cir. 2009), the Ninth Circuit held that “Congress intended the usual and long-standing principles apply – post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 7:26 am by Phyllis H. Marcus and Matthew W. Modell
T-Mobile Agrees to $48 million Settlement Over Alleged Misleading “Unlimited” Data Plan T-Mobile USA Inc. has reached a settlement with the FCC to pay $48 million to resolve claims that the company failed to sufficiently disclose that its unlimited data plans included constraints on data speed. [read post]
NARB Recommends Changes to T-Mobile Claims The National Advertising Review Board (“NARB”) recommended that T-Mobile USA, Inc. improve its disclosures to customers related to its “Ditch and Switch” campaign, as well as either alter or discontinue claims capping consumer reimbursements. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:29 am by Jenna Greene
Discount: AT&T Inc. can lower the price it pays for T-Mobile USA Inc. if the remedies requested by regulators become too expensive, according to three people with direct knowledge of the purchase contract, Bloomberg reports. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Briefly: ACSblog and Concurring Opinions have further commentary on Tuesday’s oral argument in AT&T Mobility Services v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:03 am
Last month, three current and former employees sued T-Mobile USA Inc., claiming they were required to use company-issued smart phones to respond to work messages after hours without pay. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:44 am by Sean Wajert
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 564 F.3d 1256, 1268 n. 12 (11th Cir. 2009). [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:27 pm by Phyllis H. Marcus and Carter C. Simpson
T-Mobile Faces Further Review for Its Holiday Advertisement The NAD has referred advertising claims by T-Mobile USA, Inc., to the FTC and Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) for further review after T-Mobile declined to participate in a proceeding before the NAD. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:27 pm by Phyllis H. Marcus
T-Mobile Faces Further Review for Its Holiday Advertisement The NAD has referred advertising claims by T-Mobile USA, Inc., to the FTC and Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) for further review after T-Mobile declined to participate in a proceeding before the NAD. [read post]
The 5th Circuit struck down a similarly overbroad no-recording policy in T-Mobile USA Inc. v. [read post]