Search for: "TAYLOR v. AMERICAN UNIVERSITY" Results 181 - 200 of 291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  That disposition of “constitutional faith” is perhaps the most truly “exceptional” aspect of American political culture. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:08 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Office issued the following 217 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2024 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration         Number           Wordmark 7377089 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377091 MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377090 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7383748 GUIDED PATHWAYS 7383753 GAME CHANGERS 7383747 PURPOSE FIRST 7383749 MOMENTUM PATHWAYS 7378370 KATHLEEN POST 7382555… [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:50 pm by Bill Marler
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has an article summarising and commenting on the 30 March 2022 judgment of Chief Constable of Kent Police & Anor v Taylor [2022] EWHC 737 (QB), in which Saini J allowed a claim for breach of confidence arising from the Defendant’s refusal to delete videos that a law firm that had accidentally disclosed to him and which contained sensitive information about a vulnerable minor. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
American Cyanamid Co., 718 P.2d 1318, 1324 (Kan. 1986); Wooderson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
”[4] [1] Hay v African Gold Recovery Co 1902 TS 232 p 233. [2] University of Southampton’s Applications [2006] RPC 567 (CA) paras 22–25. [3] Bertie Van Zyl (Pty) Ltd v Minister for Safety and Security 2010 (2) SA 181 (CC) para 21. [4] Josh Taylor, “I’m sorry Dave I’m afraid I invented that: Australian court finds AI systems can be recognised under patent law,” The Guardian (July 30, 2021)… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Baker41Florida Institute of Technology, 2Lynn University, 3Florida Institute of Technology, 4Florida Institute of Technology [Sexual Offender Treatment, Volume 2 (2007), Issue 1] Abstract Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent perceptions about sexual offenders are based on empirical evidence or misconceptions.Background: Sexual offenders have often been under the spotlight of media attention and public censure. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Legal Blogging and the Rhetorical Genre of Public Legal Writing Jennifer Murphy Romig, Instructor of Legal Writing, Research and Advocacy, Emory University School of LawLegal Communication & Rhetoric: JALWD, Vol. 12, 2015 Excerpt: Introduction, Section II, and Appendices Introduction Now is the time to bring scholarly attention to a new genre of legal writing: the blog posts, tweets, updates, and other writing on social media that many lawyers generate and many others would consider… [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Legal Research, Legal Reasoning and Precedent in Canada in the Digital Age Jonathan de Vries is a Partner at Shillingtons LLP in London, Ontario and a PhD Candidate at Western University. (2018) 48 Advocates’ Quarterly 1. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Belmont Report—flagship of American regulation. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” The 1969 Supreme Court decision in Powell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]