Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF OKLAHOMA, by and through its Judges" Results 181 - 200 of 490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
In 1961, the Supreme Court made clear in Monroe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:00 am by JB
The state supreme courts of Ohio, Oklahoma, and South Dakota have all repudiated Kelo as a guide to the interpretation of their state constitutions, ruling that “economic development”  takings are banned by their respective state public use clauses. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:37 pm by Amy Howe
A three-judge district court ruled that D.C. residents are not entitled to representation in the House because they do not live in a “state”; the Supreme Court on Monday allowed that ruling to stand. [read post]
Pruitt, the Oklahoma Attorney General, filed his own legal challenge (on behalf of the State of Oklahoma) to the validity of the Clean Water Rule. [read post]
The initial law was declared facially unconstitutional in 1998 after the Iowa Supreme Court issued its ruling in Bormann v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
” The Fourteenth Amendment contains no specifics; the Supreme Court determines its content through cases.At the time Roe was argued, the Court had twice ruled that the Due Process Clause protected certain personal rights under the umbrella of a “right to privacy. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:11 am
In the past two months, two federal courts, one in Utah, the other in Oklahoma, have declared that state bans on same-sex marriage violate the Constitution’s promise of equal protection and due process. [read post]
Last night, President Trump nominated Judge Neil Gorsuch of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals to fill the ninth seat on the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:04 pm by Erin Miller
Bush,” Virginia Law Review (2006), and “John Paul Stevens,” Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States (2008). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Justice Department did not use its options of slowing down the progress of the cases toward the Supreme Court, indicating that it, too, wanted a prompt decision. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
  The Supreme Court begins its opinion by explaining that[a]s recently as ten years ago, it was considered a cutting edge development in civil practice for a court to allow the service of a summons by email. [read post]