Search for: "TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT COMPANY v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:38 am
In Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:45 am
In Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The administrative order signed by the company requires it to follow a schedule of clean up agreed to by EPA and the company. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty) Ltd:… [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
– EPA News Release, July 1, 2010 Cemen Tech, Inc., a manufacturer of concrete mixing equipment, has agreed to pay a $59,775 civil penalty to the United States to settle a series of alleged violations of federal hazardous waste laws at its facility in Indianola, Iowa. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
Non-final orders, jurisdiction, and fresh pasta with tomatoes, rosemary and braised kale with garlic
4 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm
ROUTH, Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
Can-Am Plumbing v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Those inspections noted several violations of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Taxes on machinery and equipment create an incentive for mobile capital to flow to other states, which has increasingly led states to place tangible personal property taxes on the chopping block.[14] Property taxes (both real and personal) are often subject to what is known as an assessment ratio, which specifies the percentage of the property’s value subject to the tax millage. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Bakanovases did not leave the United States, and in January 2007 they were arrested on immigration charges and released on bond. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:00 pm
All excess and damaged centrifuges and equipment will be stored under continuous monitoring by the IAEA, also at Natanz. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Department of Transportation and U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
And, given the essential nature of the transport of crude oil by TAPS, and the potentially serious consequences of a work stoppage, either on the pipeline or at the VMT, increasing the likelihood of a disruption by finding a less than systemwide unit to be appropriate is unacceptable. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:16 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
However, it limited the scope of the injunction to foreign nationals with a bona fide relationship to a person or entity in the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
