Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2010, 3:17 pm
Which takes me a while -- 14 single-spaced pages, to be exact -- but at that point, I'm all of the sudden not so sure. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 3:53 pm
Alvarez v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
One of them takes one aspect of the ongoing Nokia v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:55 pm
(Note to Rich: Take care of yourself. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Rodriquez (06-1646), asking whether, for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, courts must look only at the maximum sentence under state law for a particular drug offense or may also take sentencing enhancements based on prior convictions into account, and in Begay v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:39 am
California, the Court reflected upon the resurrection of an offense after the statute of limitations had passed. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
In 2008’s Doe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:45 am
As we have noted previously, the California Court of Appeal’s Hassell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:29 am
Last April’s California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am
Here are the relevant statutory provisions, from the California Labor Code (dating back to 1937): 1101. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion in California v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
Supreme Court found that the California parole statute was not an Ex Post Facto law in California Dept. of Corrections v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:34 am
Again, on May 27, 2009, the same day that the federal challenge to California’s Proposition 8 in Perry v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:01 am
I'm not going to claim that I totally understand California's vindictive prosecution jurisprudence. [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:41 pm
In its decision in Lange v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:37 pm
Adam Thierer has already provided an excellent overview of the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 3:19 pm
His sentence was enhanced 16 offense levels because he had a robbery conviction, under California Penal Code § 211. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
California, 505 U.S. 437, 439 (1992); see State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm
Not so hot, it turns out, for AUSAs.United States v. [read post]
