Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2017, 6:55 am
” … The sheriff said he wants to avoid a situation where somebody could take offense to the sign on the truck, possibly leading to a confrontation. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
California would govern. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
California, 13-8618; Galloway v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:16 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
Virginia Citizens Consumer Council Inc. to Zauderer v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm
Killing her.That's a horrific offense. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
LEXIS 135394 (WD PA, Aug. 9. 2018), a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge, in a case on remand from the 3rd Circuit, recommended dismissing an inmate's complaint that the sex offender program's requirement that he take responsibility for his offenses amounts to a religious confession which is only to be made to God through Jesus.In Kelly v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:17 pm
Which takes me a while -- 14 single-spaced pages, to be exact -- but at that point, I'm all of the sudden not so sure. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 3:53 pm
Alvarez v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 5:02 am
If (for instance) we’re talking about Cohen v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
One of them takes one aspect of the ongoing Nokia v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:55 pm
(Note to Rich: Take care of yourself. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:39 am
California, the Court reflected upon the resurrection of an offense after the statute of limitations had passed. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Rodriquez (06-1646), asking whether, for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, courts must look only at the maximum sentence under state law for a particular drug offense or may also take sentencing enhancements based on prior convictions into account, and in Begay v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:21 am
California, 538 U.S. 11 (2003) (upholding a sentence of twenty-five years to life under California’s three-strikes law for the theft of three golf clubs); Hutto v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:45 am
As we have noted previously, the California Court of Appeal’s Hassell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:29 am
Last April’s California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
In 2008’s Doe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 3:11 am
Here are the relevant statutory provisions, from the California Labor Code (dating back to 1937): 1101. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
Supreme Court found that the California parole statute was not an Ex Post Facto law in California Dept. of Corrections v. [read post]
