Search for: "Taylor v. Commissioner"
Results 181 - 200
of 348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm
It is reported that that on 2 July 2015 in the case of Taylor v NGN Laing J refused the former world darts champion Phil Taylor an injunction to prevent the Sun publishing an interview with his estranged daughters. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 11:27 pm
He is currently the co-commissioner of Quebec’s the Charbonneau Commission, which is examining allegations of corruption in the construction industry.MembersRebecca J. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
On 7 June 2019 Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police [2019] EWHC 1439 (QB) (heard 5 June 2019). [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
KG v OHIM, Wedl & Hofmann GmbH. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
R v Reeves Taylor, heard 24-25 Jun 2019. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:49 am
R v Reeves Taylor, heard 24-25 Jun 2019. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
See, for example, City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2 104, a case addressing a conflict between a Taylor Law contract provision and the Civil Service Law with regard to the layoff rights of employees. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-10-31 https://t.co/uvX7YYBpna -> Admissibility of electronic evidence R. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
Taylor, 2019 Cal. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:50 am
B is for Baglow v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:23 pm
[see Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045]. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
R v Reeves Taylor, heard 24-25 Jun 2019. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:57 am
Taylor v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 3:15 am
Druide Informatique i2017 QCCS 4092 https://t.co/Nz2Jn0AaEG -> When chamomile did not have a calming effect on the Court https://t.co/cvvRCSXhVm -> Ukraine Faces Call for US Trade Sanctions over Online Piracy https://t.co/LPKqJmyEpu -> Taylor Swift faces copyright lawsuit for 'Shake It Off' https://t.co/3EBbNgUAcW -> Building a Health App? [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm
Chief Constable of Kent Police v Taylor [2022] EWHC 737 (QB) A breach of confidence claim relating to a series of videos which the defendant was provided by Berryman’s Lace Mawer LLP (“BLM”). [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:19 am
Taylor, Tennessee Personal Injury Blog, August 18, 2016. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
