Search for: "Taylor v. Superior Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2013, 6:37 am
In any event, the Superior Court dismissed Mr. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 1:54 pm
Sure, maybe Judge Taylor thought that there was sufficient evidence. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:25 am
A recent decision by the Georgia Court of Appeals, Taylor v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:28 am
The court of appeals held that the Supreme Court rejected the "due diligence" exception to Brady in Banks v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 10:05 pm
The case is STATE v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 2:50 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 10:56 am
” That’s the way it was under common law until the 1863 English court case of Taylor v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:32 pm
In Bowman v Secular Society Limited [1917] AC 406 at 457, Lord Sumner refers to the older Taylor’s case of 1676 1 Vent, as follows: ‘…and Hale said that such kind of wicked blasphemous words were not only an offence to God and religion, but a crime against the Laws, State, and Government, and therefore punishable in this Court. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:29 pm
The inset photo is of the US Courthouse for the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas in Little Rock, home to Bankruptcy Judges Evans, Mixon and Taylor. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 4:30 pm
Court of Appeals in Taylor v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Perhaps the leading case illustrating this principle is Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:51 pm
D.C. criminal defense lawyers understand that the court in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm
But in the high court's 2009 Arizona v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
Quinn in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice case of Kamboj v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm
The trial court (Ventura Superior Court, Judge Barbara A. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Superior Court (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 214. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:49 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Hickman v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
The exclusion of union representatives, said the court, "ensures that the charges will be probed confidentially and professionally by investigators independent of the employee's own agency and superiors. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:33 am
They sought a court order reinstating their membership “with full benefits. [read post]
