Search for: "Texas v. Martinez"
Results 181 - 200
of 300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 11:24 am
The Texas lawsuit Bonser-Lain v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:28 am
A 2012 Supreme Court ruling, Martinez v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has flat out refused to follow the Supreme Court’s March 2012 Martinez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:35 pm
A three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit, however, recently decided that Martinez does not apply to Texas, in the case of Ibarra v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
And so Hearn got double burned.As alarms go off everywhere but Texas, the Supreme Court's ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
In Texas, the perpetually rogue Fifth Circuit, in an opinion dripping with disdain for the justices in Washington, has just refused to apply the precedent established in Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 1:36 pm
The rule of Martinez v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Take it away, Martinez v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
A subsequent state habeas petition from Cook, 10-9742, was then put on hold for Martinez v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:33 am
Mar. 29, 2012); Martinez v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Víctor M. [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:11 pm
Martinez, 174 S.W. 3d. 772 (Tex. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Ricardo Martinez, Case No. 12-20316-CR-Martinez This indictment charges defendant Ricardo Martinez with health care fraud and paying kickbacks to patients. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:09 pm
According to the recent Texas Supreme Court decision in Safeshred v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:07 am
We've found that every Texas lawyer has an interesting story. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:09 am
Andrews Restoration, Inc. d/b/a Protech Services and Rudy Martinez v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:19 am
You can download a complete copy of Safeshred, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:33 pm
Safeshred, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
SOURCE: TEXAS SUPREME COURT - Safeshred, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:43 am
Safeshred v. [read post]
